Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 19 de 19
Filter
1.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 49(4): e4878, 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-951661

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to compare the totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy techniques regarding their rates of success and complications in patients with kidney stones. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Forty-four patients (24 men; mean age: 50.40±2.02 years) received totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL; no nephrostomy catheter or ureteral catheter after PCNL) and 40 patients (18 men; mean age: 49.95±13.38 years) underwent standard PCNL (a nephrostomy catheter and ureteral catheter were used after PCNL). All surgeries were performed by one surgeon. Postoperative changes in hemoglobin, the blood transfusion rate, changes in creatinine levels, operation time, analgesic need, hospitalization time, and complication rate were compared between the groups. No significant differences were observed in age, gender, stone size, and surgery side between the groups (P<0.05). The operation time was significantly lower in the totally tubeless PCNL group than in the standard PCNL group (P=0.005). Pethidine requirements were significantly higher in the standard PCNL group than the totally tubeless PCNL group (P=0.007). Hospitalization time was significantly higher in the standard PCNL group than in the totally tubeless PCNL group (P<0.0001). The complication rate was 15% in the standard PCNL group and 9.1% in the totally tubeless PCNL group (P=0.73). The totally tubeless PCNL technique is safe and effective, even for patients with staghorn stones. This technique is associated with decreased pain, analgesic needs, and operative and hospitalization time. We believe that a normal peristaltic ureter is the best drainage tube.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/adverse effects , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/methods , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/instrumentation , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome , Operative Time , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Length of Stay
2.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(5): 1014-1019, Sept.-Oct. 2015. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-767041

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: To report our technique that helps locate the guidewire into the ureter enabling safe dilatation during PCNL. Materials and Methods: Cases in which the guidewire failed to pass into the ureter following successful puncture of the desired calyx were subjected to this technique. A second guidewire was passed through the outer sheath of a 9 Fr. metallic dilator cannula, passed over the first guidewire. The cannula and outer sheath were removed, followed by percutaneous passage of a 6/7.5 Fr ureteroscope between the two guidewires, monitoring its progress through both the endoscopic and fluoroscopic monitors. Once the stone was visualized in the calyx a guidewire was passed through the working channel and maneuvered past the stone into the pelvis and ureter under direct endoscopic vision. This was followed by routine tract dilatation. Results: This technique was employed in 85 out of 675 cases of PCNL carried out at our institute between Jan 2010 to June 2014. The mean time required for our technique, calculated from the point of introduction of the ureteroscope untill the successful passage of the guidewire down into the ureter was 95 seconds. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications as a result of this technique. Guidewire could be successfully passed into the ureter in 82 out of 85 cases. Conclusions: Use of the ureteroscope introduced percutaneously through the puncture site in PCNL, is a safe and effective technique that helps in maneuvering the guidewire down into the ureter, which subsequently enables safe dilatation.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Dilatation/methods , Kidney Calices/surgery , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/methods , Ureter/surgery , Dilatation/instrumentation , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/instrumentation , Punctures/instrumentation , Punctures/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ureteroscopes
3.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(5): 953-958, Sept.-Oct. 2015. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-767052

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate the efficiency of a novel device coupled with ultrassound for renal percutaneous puncture. Materials and Methods: After establishing hydronephrosis, ten pigs had three calyxes of each kidney punctured by the same urology resident, with and without the new device ("Punctiometer"). Time for procedure completion, number of attempts to reach the calyx, puncture precision and puncture complications were recorded in both groups and compared. Results: Puncture success on the first attempt was achieved in 25 punctures (83%) with the Punctiometer and in 13 punctures (43%) without the Punctiometer (p=0.011). The mean time required to perform three punctures in each kidney was 14.5 minutes with the Punctiometer and 22.4 minutes without the Punctiometer (p=0.025). The only complications noted were renal hematomas. In the Punctiometer group, all kidneys had small hematomas. In the no Punctiometer group 80% had small hematomas, 10% had a medium hematoma and 10% had a big hematoma. There was no difference in complications between both groups. Conclusions: The Punctiometer is an effective device to increase the likelihood of an accurate renal calyx puncture during PCNL, with a shorter time required to perform the procedure.


Subject(s)
Animals , Kidney Calices/surgery , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/instrumentation , Punctures/instrumentation , Ultrasonography, Interventional/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Models, Animal , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/methods , Punctures/methods , Random Allocation , Reproducibility of Results , Swine , Time Factors , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods
4.
Korean Journal of Urology ; : 614-623, 2015.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-47852

ABSTRACT

Since its initial introduction in 1976, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been widely performed for the management of large renal stones and currently is recommended for staghorn calculi, kidney stones larger than 2 cm, and shock wave lithotripsy-resistant lower pole stones greater than 1 cm. However, except for open and laparoscopic surgery, PCNL is the most invasive of the minimally invasive stone surgery techniques. Over the years, technical and instrumental advances have been made in PCNL to reduce morbidity and improve effectiveness. A thorough review of the recent literature identified five major areas of progress for the advancement of PCNL: patient positioning, method of percutaneous access, development of lithotriptors, miniaturized access tracts, and postoperative nephrostomy tube management. This review provides an overview of recent advancements in PCNL and the outcomes of each area of progress and notes how much we achieve with less invasive PCNL. This information may allow us to consider the future role and future developments of PCNL.


Subject(s)
Humans , Catheters, Indwelling , Drainage , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Lithotripsy/instrumentation , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/instrumentation , Patient Positioning , Postoperative Care , Radiology, Interventional , Ultrasonography, Interventional
5.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 40(5): 650-655, 12/2014. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-731126

ABSTRACT

Purpose We aimed to compare the outcomes of pneumatic (PL), ultrasonic (UL) and combined (PL/UL) lithotripsy performed in percutaneous lithotripsy (PNL) according to success rates and stone clearence. Materials and Methods The medical records of 512 patients treated with PNL between April 2010 and April 2013 were evaluated. Postoperative stone analysis revealed as calcium oxalate in 408 of these patients. The operation notes of 355 patients recorded in detail with complete parameters were reviewed. According to stone disintegration method, patients were divided into three groups: PL only in Group I, UL only in Group II, and UL/PL combination in Group III. Number of patients was 155, 110 and 90, respectively. Results Fluoroscopy screening time was significantly shorter in group II, and III compared to group I (p<0.001). The failure rates were 13.5% (21 patients) for group I, 3.6% (4 patients) for group II, and 3.3% (3 patients) for group III. There was a significant statistical difference in favor of group II and III by means of success (p=0.023). Group II and III had larger FSA, and this was statistically significant (p=0.032). Stone disintegration time (SDT) was 64.0±41.92 minutes for group I, 49.5±34.63 for group II, and 37.7±16.89 for group III. Group III has a statistically significant shorter SDT (p=0.011). Conclusions We concluded that, in cases with high stone burden, where faster and efficient lithotripsy is needed, combined ultrasonic / pneumatic lithotripter may be the ideal choice and in suitable cases ultrasonic lithotripter usage provides important advantages to the surgeon. .


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Combined Modality Therapy/instrumentation , Kidney Calculi/therapy , Lithotripsy/instrumentation , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/instrumentation , Analysis of Variance , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Equipment Design , Fluoroscopy , Length of Stay , Lithotripsy/methods , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/methods , Operative Time , Statistics, Nonparametric , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
6.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 40(5): 690-696, 12/2014. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-731129

ABSTRACT

Purpose We investigated the characteristics and management of patients with intravenous misplacement of a nephrostomy tube. Materials and Methods Between July 2007 and July 2013, 4148 patients with urolithiasis underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in our hospital. Intravenous misplacement of a nephrostomy tube occurred in two of these patients. Another patient with intravenous misplacement of a nephrostomy tube, who underwent PCNL in another hospital, was transferred to our hospital. The data of the three patients were retrospectively analyzed. Results The incidence of intravenous misplacement of a nephrostomy tube following PCNL was 0.5% (2/4148) at our hospital. A solitary kidney was present in one of the three patients. The tip of tube was located into the inferior vena cava (IVC) in two patients and into the renal vein in one patient. All three patients were successfully managed with strict bed rest, intravenous antibiotics and one-step (one patient) or two-step (two patients) tube withdrawal under close monitoring. None of the patients underwent antithrombotic therapy. The original operations were performed successfully under close observation in two patients and changed to another operation in one patient. All patients were discharged uneventfully. Conclusions The incidence of intravenous misplacement of a nephrostomy tube following PCNL is 0.5% at our hospital. Intravenous nephrostomy tube misplacement is an uncommon complication of PCNL. A solitary kidney may render patients susceptible to this complication. Most patients may be managed conservatively with strict bed rest, intravenous antibiotics and one-step or two-step tube withdrawal under close monitoring. .


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Lithotripsy/adverse effects , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Urolithiasis/surgery , Lithotripsy/instrumentation , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/instrumentation , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Renal Veins , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Urography , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Vena Cava, Inferior
7.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 40(2): 204-211, Mar-Apr/2014. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-711694

ABSTRACT

IntroductionTubeless PCNL has been utilized to shorten hospital stay and improve patient postoperative pain control. Prior studies have excluded those patients with significant bleeding or other complications. Our objective was to evaluate the utility of tubeless PCNL in all patients irrespective of intraoperative outcome.Materials and MethodsA retrospective review of the charts of patients who underwent PCNL at our institute was performed. Patients were assigned to one endourologist who routinely performed tubeless PCNL and to a second endourologist who routinely left a small-bore pigtail nephrostomy. Preoperative demographics operative and postoperative outcomes were compared.ResultsOut of 159 patients included, 83 patients had tubeless PCNL while 76 patients had standard PCNL. There was no difference between groups regarding age, gender, ASA score, number, maximum diameter of stones, number of calyces involved, stone density (HU), laterality and use of preoperative narcotics. While staghorn stones were more common in patients who underwent standard PCNL (p = 0.008). Tubeless patients had less number of access tracts (p ≤ 0.001), shorter hospital stay (1.7 vs. 3.0 days, p = 0.001) when compared to standard PCNL group. Multivariable analysis controlling for confounding factors including staghorn calculi and number of accesses confirmed that tubeless PCNL was associated with shorter hospital stay and less postoperative pain. There was no significant difference in complication rates between the two groups.ConclusionOur report confirms the previous reports of shorter hospital stay, less pain and analgesia as compared to standard PCNL, and establishes its safety irrespective of bleeding, perforation, extravasation or other intraoperative issues that have previously been utilized as exclusionary criteria for this approach.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Intraoperative Complications , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/adverse effects , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/methods , Postoperative Complications , Body Mass Index , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Multivariate Analysis , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/instrumentation , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
8.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 38(6): 795-801, Nov-Dec/2012. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-666015

ABSTRACT

Purpose

To compare totally tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolitotomy procedures on many parameters. Materials and Methods

Percutaneous nephrolitotomy was performed on 195 patients between June 2009 and May 2012. The data of those patients were evaluated retrospectively. Totally tubeless cases were enrolled to Group 1, and Group 2 consisted of non-tubeless cases (re-entry or Foley catheter). Results

Group 1 included 85 cases and group 2 a total of 110 patients. Paper tracing values for the kidney stones were 321.25 ± 102.4 mm2 and 324.10 ± 169.5 mm2 respectively. Mean fluoroscopy time was 4.9 ± 1.9 min and 5.08 ± 2.7 min, mean operation time was 78.8 ± 27.9 min and 81.9 ± 28.77 min and mean decrease in hematocrit was 2.6 ± 1.6 and 3.74 ± 1.9 respectively. All these comparisons were statistically significant. Length of hospitalization was 1.6 ± 1.1 and 3.5 ± 1.5 days for Groups 1 and 2 respectively. Mean superficial pain score was 5.8 ± 1.6 and 6.7 ± 1.2 respectively for both groups after 1 hour. At 6 hours, the scores changed to 3.87 ± 1.22 and 4.84 ± 1.3 respectively. The analgesic dose was 1.00 ± 0.7 and 1.53 ± 0.6 for the groups respectively at 6 hours. All the statistical differences were significant for these three parameters. Conclusions

We believe that, because of their post operative patient comfort and decreased length of hospital stay, totally tubeless procedures should be considered as an alternative to standard percutaneous nephrolitotomy. .


Subject(s)
Humans , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/methods , Length of Stay , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/instrumentation , Operative Time , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Catheterization
9.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 36(6): 738-748, Dec. 2010. ilus, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-572425

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To design a simple, cost-effective system for gaining rapid and accurate calyceal access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The design consists of a low-cost, light-weight, portable mechanical gantry with a needle guiding device. Using C-arm fluoroscopy, two images of the contrast-filled renal collecting system are obtained: at 0-degrees (perpendicular to the kidney) and 20-degrees. These images are relayed to a laptop computer containing the software and graphic user interface for selecting the targeted calyx. The software provides numerical settings for the 3 axes of the gantry, which are used to position the needle guiding device. The needle is advanced through the guide to the depth calculated by the software, thus puncturing the targeted calyx. Testing of the system was performed on 2 target types: 1) radiolucent plastic tubes the approximate size of a renal calyx (5 or 10 mm in diameter, 30 mm in length); and 2) foam-occluded, contrast-filled porcine kidneys. RESULTS: Tests using target type 1 with 10 mm diameter (n = 14) and 5 mm diameter (n = 7) tubes resulted in a 100 percent targeting success rate, with a mean procedure duration of 10 minutes. Tests using target type 2 (n = 2) were both successful, with accurate puncturing of the selected renal calyx, and a mean procedure duration of 15 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanical gantry system described in this paper is low-cost, portable, light-weight, and simple to set up and operate. C-arm fluoroscopy is limited to two images, thus reducing radiation exposure significantly. Testing of the system showed an extremely high degree of accuracy in gaining precise access to a targeted renal calyx.


Subject(s)
Kidney Calices/surgery , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/instrumentation , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Equipment Design , Fluoroscopy , Needles , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Robotics/instrumentation , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Time Factors
10.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 36(2): 171-176, Mar.-Apr. 2010. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-548376

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in selected patients has been found to be safe and can reduce postoperative discomfort without increasing complications. The challenges of tubeless PCNL via supracostal access are inadequate drainage and postoperative bleeding, conditions that may increase pulmonary complications. We compare the efficacy and safety of the tubeless supracostal versus the standard supracostal PCNL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Supracostal PCNL with one percutaneous renal access, no significant bleeding, extravasation and residual stone was performed in 95 patients. Of these, 43 were tubeless PCNL (Group-I) and 52 were PCNL with standard routine postoperative nephrostomy tube (Group-II). In group-I, PCNL was done by the standard supracostal technique with the placement of a postoperative external ureteral catheter for 48 hours. The operative time, success rate, hospital stay and ensuing complications were compared between group-I and group-II. RESULTS: Patients in the tubeless PCNL group (Group-I) were 90.7 percent stone -free while those with standard routine postoperative nephrostomy tube(Group-II) were 84.6 percent stone -free. Additionally, stone fragments of less than 4 mm in diameter were found in 9.3 percent of patients in group-I and 25.4 percent in group-II. The success rate, hematocrit change and complication were not significantly different between both groups. The analgesic requirement, operative time and hospital stay were all significantly less in the tubeless supracostal group (Group-I). None of group I and only one patient of group II needed intercostal drainage. CONCLUSION: Tubeless supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients is effective with acceptable complications. This technique offers the advantage of lower analgesic requirement, shorter operative time and hospital stay. The pulmonary complication is the same as the standard supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Lung Diseases/etiology , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/adverse effects , Postoperative Hemorrhage/etiology , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/instrumentation , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/methods , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
11.
J. bras. nefrol ; 31(3): 232-234, jul.-set. 2009. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-550180

ABSTRACT

Fístula arteriovenosa (FAV) é uma rara complicação pós-nefrolitotripsia percutãnea (NLP). Apresentamos o caso de um paciente de 70 anos, sexo masculino, que apresentou sangramento maciço após NLP, tratado por angioembolização renal superseletiva com implante de stent. Após a embolização, houve resolução do sangramento. FAV é uam complicação incomum da NLP, que pode ser tratada com sucesso com angioembolização.


Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is a rare complication after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). We present the case of a 70-year-old male who had massive bleeding after NLP, angioembolização treated by superselective renal stent implantation. After embolization, there was resolution of bleeding. AVF is uam uncommon complication of NLP, which can be treated successfully with angioembolização.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Arteriovenous Malformations/diagnosis , Arteriovenous Malformations/therapy , Nephrolithiasis/surgery , Nephrolithiasis/pathology , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/instrumentation , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous , Angiography
13.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 34(5): 546-554, Sept.-Oct. 2008. ilus, graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-500389

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The dynamics of percutaneous balloon expansion may differ with increasing extrinsic compressive forces and increasing inflation pressures. This study compares the ability of percutaneous balloons to expand under different radial constrictive forces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three 30F nephrostomy balloons were tested: Bard X-Force™, Boston Scientific Microvasive Amplatz Tractmaster™, and Cook Ultraxx™. With a super stiff guidewire in place, the balloon tip was secured by elevated vice grips on either side of the balloon. A string was wrapped around the balloon center once, and incremental increases in load were added (2g, 42g, 82g, and 122g) to represent increasing extrinsic compression. The balloon was inflated with a contrast agent and circumference changes were measured at increments of 4 ATM, 10 ATM, and burst pressure. Balloons were tested in triplicate for each load. RESULTS: All balloons were unable to reach 90 percent of their expected diameter with larger constrictive loads (122g) at low (4 ATM) and nominal (10 ATM) inflation pressures. Only the Bard and Cook balloons reached at least 90 percent of the expected diameter with a coefficient of variance (CV) less than 10 percent at burst pressure under the larger constrictive load (122g), 94.3 percent ± 6.7 percent, CV 7.1 percent and 96.3 percent ± 2.9 percent, CV 3.0 percent respectively. All balloons performed well under low constriction forces and reached at least 80 percent of the expected diameter by 10 ATM under all constrictive loads. CONCLUSIONS: The Bard X-Force and Cook Ultraxx percutaneous nephrostomy balloons achieved the most reliable radial dilation against large constrictive forces simulating fascial or retroperitoneal scar tissue.


Subject(s)
Humans , /instrumentation , Materials Testing/methods , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/instrumentation , Compressive Strength , Dilatation/methods , Pressure
14.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 33(3): 313-322, May-June 2007. ilus, graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-459853

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Conduct a prospective randomized single-blind comparison of two nephrostomy catheter designs, evaluating specifically intraoperative placement and postoperative comfort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The single-blind, prospective randomized trial was conducted with institutional review board approval. All patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy who gave informed consent were randomized to placement of either a Boston Scientific Flexima 8.3F pigtail nephrostomy tube #27-180 (PIG) or a Boston Scientific 8.2F nephroureteral stent #410-126 (NUS). Randomization was concealed from the surgeon until time of placement. Subjective intraoperative placement characteristics were rated by the surgeon on a scale of 1 = excellent, 2 = fair, 3 = good and 4 = poor. The patient's postoperative pain intensity was evaluated with a Visual Analog Pain Score (0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain). RESULTS: Nine patients were randomized to each group. The PIG group was rated significantly better than the NUS group with regards to ease of placement (p = 0.007) and radiopacity of the tube (p = 0.007) by surgeon. Visual analog pain scores on postoperative day one, was significantly lower in the PIG group (mean = 2+/-2) than the NUS group (mean = 5+/-1) (p = 0.004). The mean amount of intra-venous morphine equivalent given in the PIG group (mean = 1+/4 Eq morphine) was less on average compared to the NUS group (mean = 6+/13 Eq morphine), but the differences did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Following percutaneous nephrolithotomy, use of a small pig-tail nephrostomy tube results in greater ease of placement and less postoperative pain than a nephroureteral catheter.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Catheterization/instrumentation , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/instrumentation , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Drainage/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/methods , Pain Measurement , Postoperative Care , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome
15.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 31(5): 470-471, Sept.-Oct. 2005. ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-418167

ABSTRACT

Percutaneous tube nephrostomy (PTN) placement is associated with bleeding complications in a small proportion of cases. We study a case of inadvertent renal vein catheterization during PTN tube change with catheter right atrial migration treated by fluoroscopically monitored catheter removal.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Middle Aged , /instrumentation , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Foreign-Body Migration , Heart Atria , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/instrumentation , /adverse effects , Device Removal/methods , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/adverse effects
16.
Rev. chil. radiol ; 10(3): 132-138, 2004. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-396262

ABSTRACT

Los procedimientos diagnósticos y paliativos guiados por ultrasonografía son analizados; entre ellos biopsias, ablación de tumores, drenajes y accesos venosos. Especial énfasis se da a la evaluación del paciente previo y posterior al procedimiento, de igual forma a la existencia de protocolos estandarizados.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/instrumentation , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/trends , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Decision Support Systems, Clinical/instrumentation , Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Ultrasonic Therapy/instrumentation , Ultrasonic Therapy/trends , Ultrasonic Therapy , Ultrasonography , Biopsy/instrumentation , Biopsy , Drainage/instrumentation , Drainage , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/instrumentation , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous , Radiography, Interventional
17.
Rio de Janeiro; s.n; 1990. ix,150 p. ilus, tab, graf.
Thesis in Portuguese | LILACS, Inca | ID: biblio-933529

ABSTRACT

Apesar de descrita há mais de trinta anos, a nefrostomia percutânea popularizou-se como método eficiente de drenagem e acesso ao trato urinário superior apenas na última década, devido à introdução novos métodos e instrumentos adequados para a sua realização. No presente estudo avaliamos sua aplicação em 61 pacientes, dos quais, 58 (95%) tiveram uma adequada introdução do catéter no sistema pielocaliciano. Foi utilizada a técnica de punção da via excretora e dilatação do trajeto sob controle radioscópico. Foi usado equipamento simplificado, na grande maioria dos casos, com o emprego de cateteres plásticos nacionais, adaptados ao procedimento, e reaproveitando-se, através de esterilização, agulhas, fios-guias e dilatadores do "Kit" original importado. Nessa casuística, obteve-se sobrevida média de 6 meses em dezoito pacientes (29,5%). O índice de complicações significativas incluindo as da fase de aprendizado, foi de 5%. Com estes dados pode-se concluir que a nefrostomia percutânea, realizada com as adaptações técnicas impostas pelas limitações do nosso meio, é um excelente método de drenagem apresentando vantagens tanto sobre a técnica cirúrgica aberta, quanto sobre o emprego de equipamentos especificos importados.


Although described more than 30 years ago, the percutaneous nephrostomy has become popular an efficient drilling method for access to the superior urinary tract only in the last decade, duct to the introduction of new methods and adequate instruments for usage. In the present study we evaluated its use in 61 patients. From the group mentioned, 58 (95%) had a proper introduction of a catheter in the pyelochaliceal system. The technique of puncture of the excretory duct and the en largement of the tract under radioscopic control was used. A very simplified equipment was usedj in the majority of the cases, the use a plastic brazilian catheter modified for the procedure and recycled through sterilization, needles, guiding thread and dilators from the original imported kit. In this study, we had an average survival of 6 months in 18 patients (29,5%). The significant complication rate including those of the learning phase was 5%. We can conclude that percutaneous nephrostomy, realized with technical adaptations imposed by limitations of our environment is an excellent drilling method showing advantages over the open surgical cal technique as shown with the usage of especific imported equipment.


Subject(s)
Male , Female , Humans , Neoplasms , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/adverse effects , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/instrumentation , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/methods , Ureteral Obstruction
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL